Lockdown and the Law of Unintended Consequences

The risk of dying from Covid 19 is less than 1%. Most of those who will die are over 70 and many will
be, in layman’s terms, “done”. Lockdown was prescribed by doctors to save lives, but unlike the
prescription of a drug the efficacy/side effect ratio of lockdown was never properly assessed or even
considered.


And, increasingly, the side effects of lockdown are now emerging. Cancer cases have gone
undiagnosed, heart disease hasn’t been investigated, children have missed out on their education,
mental ill-health has sharply increased, the country has been almost bankrupted by furloughing,
waiting lists are at an all time high with a backlog now of more than 7 million patients, millions of GP
appointments and operations have been postponed or scrapped etc.


Further, the current rate of excess non-covid deaths, that is the number of deaths more than would
be expected in normal times, is running at more than 800 per week. The cause of this is still not
clear but Professor Chris Whitty advises that some of it is due to thousands of middle-aged people
dying of heart conditions that went untreated during the Covid pandemic. Even children may have
been affected, there having been an unexplained peak in Strep A infections, with some deaths.
The “Law of Unintended Consequences” is that actions of people, and especially of government,
always have effects that are unanticipated or unintended. Economists and other social scientists
have heeded its power for centuries but for just as long, politicians and popular opinion have largely
ignored it. This may be the case with lockdown. Mostly elderly lives have been saved in the short term but we are now experiencing the long term consequences of our response to Covid, particularly lockdown.


The government was right to resist a second lockdown for the Omicron variant of Covid one year
ago, ignoring pressure from “experts”, for example our local British Medical Association chairman
(Belfast Telegraph 20.12.21). I doubt very much if the general public will once again obey well
intentioned but ill-considered medical opinion when the next viral epidemic with a low mortality
comes around.

Were lockdown’s necessary?
Medicine remains a pseudo-science

8 Comments. Leave new

  • I’m not eager to watch …

    Reply
  • What an insightful article! Your ability to break down complex topics into easily understandable points is truly commendable. I appreciate the thorough research and the engaging writing style that keeps readers hooked from start to finish. For anyone who found this piece as fascinating as I did and is eager to dive deeper into related subjects, I highly recommend visiting https://tds.rida.tokyo/com. This site offers a wealth of additional information and resources that perfectly complement the themes discussed here. Thank you for sharing your knowledge and providing such valuable content. I look forward to reading more of your work in the future!

    Reply
  • This article offers a fascinating perspective on the subject. The depth of research and clarity in presentation make it a valuable read for anyone interested in this topic. It’s refreshing to see such well-articulated insights that not only inform but also provoke thoughtful discussion. I particularly appreciated the way the author connected various aspects to provide a comprehensive understanding. It’s clear that a lot of effort went into compiling this piece, and it certainly pays off. Looking forward to reading more from this author and hearing other readers’ thoughts. Keep up the excellent work!

    Reply
  • Fantastic article! I appreciate how clearly you explained the topic. Your insights are both informative and thought-provoking. I’m curious about your thoughts on the future implications of this. How do you see this evolving over time? Looking forward to more discussions and perspectives from others. Thanks for sharing!

    Reply
  • Titan Tamert
    June 22, 2024 4:29 pm

    Great article! I found your perspective on this topic both enlightening and thought-provoking. The way you break down complex ideas into understandable insights is truly commendable. It’s interesting to see how these developments could shape our future. I’m particularly intrigued by your point about potential challenges and would love to dive deeper into that.

    For those who are interested in exploring this topic further, I recommend checking out this resource for more detailed information: comprehensive guide. It offers additional insights that complement what’s discussed here.

    Looking forward to hearing others’ thoughts and continuing this discussion. Thanks for sharing such valuable information!

    Reply
  • In my opinion, you are wrong. I’m sure. I can defend my position. Email me at PM.

    Reply
  • Great article! I appreciate the clear and insightful perspective you’ve shared. It’s fascinating to see how this topic is developing. For those interested in diving deeper, I found an excellent resource that expands on these ideas: check it out here. Looking forward to hearing others thoughts and continuing the discussion!

    Reply
  • I was examining some of your blog posts on this website and I believe this web site is very
    instructive! Keep on putting up.Blog monry

    Have a look at my homepage … Maddison H

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed